← Visual & cultural work

Education experience · Cultural heritage · Visual system

Under the Round
and Square Eaves

方圆屋檐下 · Fujian Tulou STEAM field-study course

A field-based learning experience that turns Fujian Tulou from heritage architecture into something students can observe, test, build, and reinterpret.

Role
Independent designer & facilitator
Team
Solo project; field delivery supported by teachers and classmates
Timeline
March–June 2023
Context
BFA graduation project · Fujian Yongding

My contribution

I independently conceived and designed the curriculum, teaching approach, visual identity, handbook, and toolkit, then facilitated the field session. Teachers and classmates supported on-site coordination and delivery.

Under the Round and Square Eaves course poster

01 · Designing for place

Heritage became something students could investigate—not just observe.

Conventional heritage lessons often explain a building before students have a reason to care. This course starts with lived details, then turns noticing into questions, experiments, and personal interpretation.

01 · Sense

Tulou impressions

Begin with what students notice, remember, and feel.

02 · Focus

Why settlements begin here

Turn observation into questions about place and community.

03 · Build

Rammed-earth challenge

Test material, structure, and construction through making.

04 · Create

Shared courtyard

Translate learning into a personal model of communal life.

02 · The learning system

Four activities, one loop from noticing to making.

The curriculum combines observation, structural reasoning, hands-on prototyping, and reflection. Each activity contributes evidence that students use in the next one.

Course flow and learning activities
01

Observe before explaining

Prompts invite students to identify spatial and structural clues before receiving historical context.

02

Make the invisible tangible

Material tests turn wall thickness, compression, and community construction into something students can hold.

03

Reflect through making

The final model asks students to reinterpret shared life rather than reproduce a historic form.

03 · In the field

The course changed when the classroom became the Tulou itself.

Students observed the architecture, tested rammed-earth construction, and translated the shared courtyard into their own models. The place supplied scale, texture, and social context that a classroom could not.

9
Sixth-grade students
1
Day field workshop
Jiqing Lou
Yongding, Fujian
2023.03.30
On-site delivery

04 · What students made

Nine responses to the same shared-space prompt.

The final models were not meant to reproduce one “correct” Tulou. Differences in roof, color, interior objects, and courtyard use reveal what each student noticed and valued.

Student Tulou model 1
01 · Student interpretation
Student Tulou model 2
02 · Student interpretation
Student Tulou model 3
03 · Student interpretation
Student Tulou model 4
04 · Student interpretation

Student work photographed and isolated from the classroom background. No student names are shown.

05 · Student voice

The most convincing outcome was what students remembered.

The handwritten reflections were lightly formatted for the school, but the observations are the students’ own. Names are omitted here.

Anonymous handwritten student reflection
“The class was fun and not tiring. I learned how a Tulou is built.”
“Seeing my finished model gave me a real sense of accomplishment.”
“I experienced the wisdom of ancient builders and learned more about Tulou.”

Anonymous excerpts, translated and cropped for privacy.

06 · The complete system

A visual identity carried the learning experience beyond the workshop.

The poster, handbook, toolkit, and exhibition materials use one visual language so the course could be introduced, delivered, and shared as a coherent experience.

Course posterCourse handbookTeaching toolkit pageTeaching toolkit material

Designed by me

Curriculum · Teaching toolkit · Visual identity · Course handbook · Field facilitation · Exhibition material

07 · Reflection

Designing the lesson meant designing for what could change.

Field delivery exposed where the plan needed to flex. The strongest learning came from adapting the sequence to students’ local knowledge, energy, and confidence.

01

Adapt to lived knowledge

Students were local residents with knowledge that a generic field guide could not anticipate.

02

Make facilitation visible

Initial shyness made small-group prompts and peer demonstration essential.

03

Reduce repetitive making

The roof-decoration step became more meaningful after simplifying repeated tasks.

Project outcome

A complete field-learning experience connecting cultural heritage, making, and student reflection.

Authorship

Independent concept, curriculum, visual system, toolkit, and facilitation—with on-site support from teachers and classmates.

Next projectA Hundred Years of Treats ↗